Australia’s housing market is doing something it has not done for a while: falling across much of the country, quickly enough for a record comparison to become plausible. Cotality’s October Home Value Index, covering results to 31 October, records a 1.2 per cent national decline for the month and a seventh consecutive monthly fall. Values are 6.7 per cent below their March peak, which Cotality equates to about $63,400 off the value of the median Australian dwelling.
That is a substantial correction. It is not, by itself, evidence of a housing-market collapse, a wave of forced sales or a banking crisis. Those are different claims, requiring different evidence. The distinction matters because “prices are falling” describes a market result; it does not tell us why they are falling, who is under pressure, or how far the adjustment will go.
Prefer to listen? Hear Kevin discuss this week’s report below.
A record pace is not the same as a record fall
The striking comparison in the Cotality report is about speed. Combined capital-city values are down 8.1 per cent over seven months. The 2017–19 downturn, which ultimately recorded an 8.2 per cent peak-to-trough decline across the combined capitals, had fallen only 1.2 per cent at the same point in its first seven months. The current downturn is therefore tracking faster than earlier episodes over the period examined. But it has not yet exceeded the previous episode’s total decline. Pace and final depth are not interchangeable; markets do not sign a contract to keep falling just because they have started briskly.
There is another useful distinction in the headline numbers. The national 6.7 per cent fall from the March peak is not the same measure as the combined capitals’ 8.1 per cent decline. Nor is the reported $63,400 a bill arriving in every homeowner’s letterbox. It is an estimate derived from an index and an approximate median dwelling value. Individual homes vary by location, property type and quality, and an index change is not a valuation of any particular property.
Regional results show why a national headline needs unpacking. In October, the combined capitals fell 1.4 per cent and combined regional values fell 0.7 per cent. Sydney was down 1.6 per cent for the month, Brisbane 2.0 per cent and Perth 1.7 per cent. But Hobart and Darwin rose. On an annual basis, Sydney and Melbourne were lower, while Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, Hobart and Darwin remained above their levels a year earlier. One national number can conceal quite different local markets.
Demand is weakening faster than the supply shortage can support prices
Cotality describes the downturn as demand-led. Its report points to affordability and serviceability constraints, four interest-rate increases, low confidence and cost-of-living pressure. It also says the May Federal Budget added downside pressure. These explanations are plausible, but they do not all carry the same evidential weight. Higher rates directly affect borrowing capacity and repayments. The claimed effect of tax changes on investor behaviour is harder to isolate from the wider shift in sentiment, credit conditions and prices.
There is evidence of buyers stepping back. Cotality estimates that sales over the three months to October were 23 per cent below a year earlier and 18 per cent below the previous five-year average. Auction clearance rates were consistently below 50 per cent; median time on market reached 39 days, the highest since August 2020; and vendor discounting rose to 4.7 per cent, its highest since May 2019. Advertised listings were at their highest level for this time of year since 2019, even though fresh listings were running below average. In other words, the issue is not simply a flood of new sellers. Homes are taking longer to clear because buyers are less willing or able to transact.
The Reserve Bank’s cash rate target is 4.60 per cent, effective from 30 September. The RBA’s next scheduled update is 3 November, so the direction of policy is not settled at the time of this draft. In its September decision, the Board said inflation remained elevated and that further increases could be required if needed. It also noted falling housing prices in most capital cities and a noticeable decline in new housing loans. That is a difficult combination: inflation may constrain the RBA’s ability to ease, while tighter financial conditions are already weighing on housing demand.
A shortage of homes does not automatically prevent prices from falling. It is a powerful long-run constraint on the availability and affordability of housing, but it does not guarantee that each prospective buyer can borrow enough to pay the asking price this month. Demand depends on incomes, credit, confidence and household budgets as well as the number of homes available. Supply conditions can therefore remain structurally tight while the market corrects in response to financing conditions.
Nor is the supply pipeline an instant remedy. The ABS recorded 16,953 dwelling approvals in August, down 6.1 per cent in seasonally adjusted terms from July. Approvals are not completions, and a single monthly result should not be treated as a verdict on future construction. Still, it is a reminder that building enough homes is a practical delivery problem involving finance, labour, materials, planning and time—not a switch that can be flipped when prices start falling.
Listen To The Discussion Below;
Correction Locked In
Australia’s housing market is doing something it has not done for a while: falling across much of the country, quickly enough for a record comparison to become plausible. Cotality’s October Home Value Index, covering results to 31 October, records a 1.2 per cent national decline for the month and a seventh consecutive monthly fall. Values are 6.7 per cent below their March peak, which Cotality equates to about $63,400 off the value of the median Australian dwelling.
That is a substantial correction. It is not, by itself, evidence of a housing-market collapse, a wave of forced sales or a banking crisis. Those are different claims, requiring different evidence. The distinction matters because “prices are falling” describes a market result; it does not tell us why they are falling, who is under pressure, or how far the adjustment will go.
A record pace is not the same as a record fall
The striking comparison in the Cotality report is about speed. Combined capital-city values are down 8.1 per cent over seven months. The 2017–19 downturn, which ultimately recorded an 8.2 per cent peak-to-trough decline across the combined capitals, had fallen only 1.2 per cent at the same point in its first seven months. The current downturn is therefore tracking faster than earlier episodes over the period examined. But it has not yet exceeded the previous episode’s total decline. Pace and final depth are not interchangeable; markets do not sign a contract to keep falling just because they have started briskly.
There is another useful distinction in the headline numbers. The national 6.7 per cent fall from the March peak is not the same measure as the combined capitals’ 8.1 per cent decline. Nor is the reported $63,400 a bill arriving in every homeowner’s letterbox. It is an estimate derived from an index and an approximate median dwelling value. Individual homes vary by location, property type and quality, and an index change is not a valuation of any particular property.
Regional results show why a national headline needs unpacking. In October, the combined capitals fell 1.4 per cent and combined regional values fell 0.7 per cent. Sydney was down 1.6 per cent for the month, Brisbane 2.0 per cent and Perth 1.7 per cent. But Hobart and Darwin rose. On an annual basis, Sydney and Melbourne were lower, while Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, Hobart and Darwin remained above their levels a year earlier. One national number can conceal quite different local markets.
Demand is weakening faster than the supply shortage can support prices
Cotality describes the downturn as demand-led. Its report points to affordability and serviceability constraints, four interest-rate increases, low confidence and cost-of-living pressure. It also says the May Federal Budget added downside pressure. These explanations are plausible, but they do not all carry the same evidential weight. Higher rates directly affect borrowing capacity and repayments. The claimed effect of tax changes on investor behaviour is harder to isolate from the wider shift in sentiment, credit conditions and prices.
There is evidence of buyers stepping back. Cotality estimates that sales over the three months to October were 23 per cent below a year earlier and 18 per cent below the previous five-year average. Auction clearance rates were consistently below 50 per cent; median time on market reached 39 days, the highest since August 2020; and vendor discounting rose to 4.7 per cent, its highest since May 2019. Advertised listings were at their highest level for this time of year since 2019, even though fresh listings were running below average. In other words, the issue is not simply a flood of new sellers. Homes are taking longer to clear because buyers are less willing or able to transact.
The Reserve Bank’s cash rate target is 4.60 per cent, effective from 30 September. The RBA’s next scheduled update is 3 November, so the direction of policy is not settled at the time of this draft. In its September decision, the Board said inflation remained elevated and that further increases could be required if needed. It also noted falling housing prices in most capital cities and a noticeable decline in new housing loans. That is a difficult combination: inflation may constrain the RBA’s ability to ease, while tighter financial conditions are already weighing on housing demand.
A shortage of homes does not automatically prevent prices from falling. It is a powerful long-run constraint on the availability and affordability of housing, but it does not guarantee that each prospective buyer can borrow enough to pay the asking price this month. Demand depends on incomes, credit, confidence and household budgets as well as the number of homes available. Supply conditions can therefore remain structurally tight while the market corrects in response to financing conditions.
Nor is the supply pipeline an instant remedy. The ABS recorded 16,953 dwelling approvals in August, down 6.1 per cent in seasonally adjusted terms from July. Approvals are not completions, and a single monthly result should not be treated as a verdict on future construction. Still, it is a reminder that building enough homes is a practical delivery problem involving finance, labour, materials, planning and time—not a switch that can be flipped when prices start falling.
Tax changes may affect sentiment before they affect tax bills
The May 2026 Budget announced changes to the tax treatment of residential investment property. Under Treasury’s published description, from 1 July 2027 negative gearing will be limited to new builds for investors buying established housing after 7:30pm AEST on 12 May 2026; existing investments held before the announcement are exempt. The capital gains tax discount will also change from 1 July 2027. These settings matter to investors assessing future returns, but they are not an immediate change to the tax bill on every existing investment property.
That timing complicates the suggestion that the reforms have already driven a broad investor retreat. Expectations can affect decisions before a law takes effect, and the ABC reports an agent’s view that policy changes have reduced enquiries. That is a useful account of what one market participant is seeing, not proof that tax policy is the principal cause of the national fall. The Cotality report itself lists several headwinds, including higher rates and affordability limits. Without transaction data isolating the effect of tax changes from those other forces, a confident causal claim would outrun the evidence.
There is also a policy tension worth watching. Changing tax incentives may alter the composition of investment and, over time, encourage investment in new housing. But if a policy change weakens demand for established properties before additional homes are built, that adjustment may affect sellers, tenants and construction decisions unevenly. The outcome depends on how investors respond and how effectively new supply is delivered. It cannot be read directly from one month of prices.
Falling prices do not mean every mortgage is in trouble
For a borrower, a lower estimated value is not the same as a higher monthly repayment. Repayments depend primarily on the loan balance, interest rate and loan terms. Falling values matter more directly when someone needs to sell, refinance, borrow against equity or move for work or family reasons. A recent buyer with a large loan and little equity can be more exposed than an owner who has held a property for years and paid down debt—even if both homes sit in the same suburb.
The RBA’s October Financial Stability Review offers a necessary counterweight to the more alarming market language. It says most households and businesses with loans are well placed to manage slower growth and lower housing prices, while acknowledging pockets of stress. The Bank reports that around 2 per cent of variable-rate owner-occupier borrowers were estimated to have a cash-flow shortfall against scheduled mortgage payments and essential expenses; it also says arrears remained around pre-pandemic levels. These are system-wide indicators, not a guarantee that any particular household is comfortable. But they do not support treating falling prices as proof of widespread mortgage failure.
The same review notes that most borrowers still have positive equity, supported by the substantial rise in home values since the pandemic, and that banks are well capitalised. That resilience can coexist with real hardship. Households with low incomes, little savings, high debt or recent purchases may feel pressure well before national measures show a crisis. Renters can also be affected by a weaker economy and rising housing costs without having a mortgage at all.
There is a further wrinkle for first-home buyers. Lower prices can improve the deposit hurdle and create more room to negotiate. But if rates are high and lenders assess serviceability conservatively, the buyer’s borrowing capacity may shrink at the same time. APRA’s mortgage serviceability buffer remains three percentage points above a borrower’s loan rate for new lending by regulated banks. The result can be a market that looks more affordable on paper while remaining difficult to enter in practice.
What to watch next
The next few months will help show whether October marks an intensifying correction or the continuation of a gradual adjustment. The RBA decision scheduled for 3 November is an immediate event to watch, but one decision will not settle the housing outlook. Inflation, employment, wages, lending activity and household spending will matter alongside the cash rate. So will whether buyers return as prices become more negotiable, and whether sellers accept the new terms of the market.
Rental conditions also deserve attention. Cotality says the national vacancy rate rose to 2.3 per cent in October, close to its decade average of 2.4 per cent but still below the 3.3 per cent average for the pre-COVID decade. It reports that rental growth is easing, though rents remain far above their level six years ago. Softer rental pressure could gradually reduce one source of housing-cost strain, but a 2.3 per cent vacancy rate is not a signal that accommodation has suddenly become plentiful.
For now, the most defensible conclusion is neither “nothing to see here” nor “property has entered a historic collapse”. Values are falling broadly, sales are weak and the speed of the decline is exceptional by the comparison Cotality presents. How deep it becomes depends on what happens next to interest rates, incomes, confidence and credit—not only on how far prices have already fallen. A correction can be painful without becoming a crisis; it can also expose vulnerable households long before the system as a whole looks fragile.
For buyers and owners, a national index is context, not a personal decision rule. Local comparable sales, a household’s cash flow, loan structure and time horizon matter more than a headline about the median. For policy makers, the lesson is less comfortable: interest rates can cool demand quickly, while building more homes takes years. Managing one problem does not automatically solve the other.
